Why Restructuring Fails Without Lateral Connections — And 12 Ways to Build Them
Organization fabric needs both vertical and lateral threads. This post offers both structural and social options for the lateral connections.
Complex organisation development projects that require strategic, structural and cultural change in large systems usually involve internal staff teams working with external consultants. The success of the work rests upon the internal and external consulting teams working together to establish a helping relationship with the client system. In this article we explore some of the challenges inherent in the internal- external partnership, and ways in which they can be set up to be successful.
In the post covid era the world of work continues to evolve, leaving leaders and managers asking themselves, and each other, how to achieve organisational goals whilst getting the best out of – and doing the best for – their employees.
What does it take to organize for purpose-driven, mission-focused “grand challenges”? This question arose during our research on participative strategy. In this article, we draw on our experience working with large-scale systems change and complex organisational design to illuminate the challenges of implementing Mission Leadership.
In change processes, ‘gamesʼ are often played between issue holders who have some authority in the client system (‘clientsʼ), ‘helpersʼ (often internal or external consultants or staff representatives such as HR or Strategy) and those affected by changes. Games can only be played out if all parties are complicit at some level. The upshot of game playing is that one or all parties find themselves set up to fail in their attempts to bring about a desired change. Games either come to a healthy, or somewhat healthy, resolution or end in an unhealthy manner. Snookered again....
Beginning in June 2023, we ran a series of sessions to investigate the separation between ‘suits’ (strategy and organisation design) and ‘cardigans’ (organisation development and change). What are the implications of this separation for HR professionals? These leaders all too often get relegated to doing the three Cs: comms, culture and clearing up.
Over the years we have been asked to coach leadership teams that are not performing or living up to their potential. It’s not uncommon to find that the team is simply too large. What is required is not (just) team coaching but team design. But …. how small is too small and how big is too big? Well, it depends! An annoying answer we know, but it happens to be true in this case. We thought it would be helpful in this post to say more than “it depends”, and to offer practitioners a way of thinking about a possible response
So, you've decided to embark on an organisation re-design – what next? Well, you are going to need to decide on a design team to create a design, and they will need data, input and perspectives to work with. So you although you, like many of our clients, might like to jump straight to the answer, you will need an inquiry/discovery process, which involves asking people for their perspectives and input into the current state and what could be improved. In this blog we explain why you need to interview people, who and how many to speak to, and what you should ask them.
The anthropologist Gregory Bateson’s phrase “the difference that makes a difference” has a powerful and intuitive resonance. He was talking about how a ‘difference’ can represent information that helps us see a situation from a different angle. This can reveal new possibilities for understanding or acting. Bateson’s idea draws attention to how in a complex system a small change or shift can have a ripple effect, bringing about other shifts and changes. Even subtle differences or changes can lead to profound shifts.
As we all continue to come to terms with ‘hybrid’ ways of working, it inevitably means that we should adapt the way we enable transformation and change in organisational life. Getting colleagues – who have become even more dispersed and time poor - to collaborate across role and departmental boundaries has become even more challenging. In our experience, it has profound implications too for the role of consultants.
I recently re-read Paul Watzlawick’s classic book Pragmatics of Human Communication. For those of you who don’t know his work, many of his ideas have influenced paradoxical theories of change and family systems theory. In the book he outlines a number of principles of human communication. We can argue that much of what happens in organisations is communication. Underneath the labels such of ‘leadership’, ‘strategy’, ‘change’, ‘structure’, ‘culture’ are in fact patterns of communication.
We were witnessing a scenario where an executive team had decided on a change of strategic direction that would affect every division. For many it meant a change of priorities and a need to reset budgets. What needed to happen, and the key communication messages were summarised before the meeting closed.
Many of us have experienced organisation re-design processes that have destroyed trust and value in the organisations in which we work (some of us have even been responsible for them). When things go wrong, it’s often down to misguided assumptions about what’s needed.
We all have opinions about our leaders. Be it on what they are doing effectively, ineffectively, or not doing at all. Some of these views are based on first-hand experience and thought-through judgements whilst others reflect projections, prejudices, or unrealistic ideals.
Most of our clients are engaged in attempts to develop or change their culture in some way, shape or form. They tend however to tell us they find such initiatives to be tricky, demanding and, ultimately, disappointing. To understand why this is the case, we have been inquiring with leaders and OD practitioners into their experience of trying to change culture.